| 918 | 14 | 68 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
“适当顾及”在最新的BBNJ协定草案中规定在第7条、第9条、第19条和第45条之中，在IGC4和IGC5磋商中也被多个国家从不同角度提及。可将“适当顾及”在BBNJ协定中的立法目的凝练为：促进国际合作、照顾特殊国家利益需求、平衡沿海国和其他国家权益冲突。结合我国地理不利国和发展中国家的定位，我国应在BBNJ谈判中构建“生态连通性”连接点，以“生态利害相关国”身份通过推动“适当顾及”程序化，并强调对发展中国家、地理不利国等特殊国家利益诉求的维护。我国还应积极加入相关国际组织，通过国际组织制定的划区管理工具体现我国利益，再通过适当顾及原则的适用间接维护我国利益。
Abstract："Due regard" is stipulated in Articles 7, 9, 19 and 45 of the latest BBNJ draft agreement, and has been mentioned by several states from different perspectives during the IGC4 and IGC5 consultations. Accordingly, the legislative purpose of the due regard principle in the BBNJ agreement comes down to promoting international cooperation, accommodating the needs of special states, and balancing the conflicting interests between coastal states and other states. Considering its position as both a geographically disadvantaged country and a developing country, China is suggested to establish a connecting point of "ecological connectivity" in the BBNJ negotiations, make the due regard principle programmed with the identity of an "ecologically interested country", and protect the interests of developing countries, geographically disadvantaged countries and other special countries. In addition, China should actively join relevant international organizations which are entitled to developing area-based management tools, by means of which China′s interests will be safeguarded through application of the due regard principle.
[1] 张国斌.《联合国海洋法公约》“适当顾及”研究[J].中国海洋法学评论，2014,(2):53-69.
[2] 何海榕.论“适当顾及”的国际法义务及其对中国的启示[J].武大国际法评论，2020,(4):34-52.
[3] 张卫华.专属经济区中的“适当顾及”义务[J].国际法研究，2015,(5):47-59.
[4] 张丽娜.海洋科学研究中的适当顾及义务[J].社会科学辑刊，2017,(5):105-111.
[5] 刘惠荣，马玉婷.实现BBNJ划区管理工具制度中的海洋生态连通性——以“适当顾及”沿海国权益为路径[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(1):12-20.
[6] Joanna Mossop,Clive Schofield.Adjacency and due regard:The role of coastal states in the BBNJ treaty[J].Marine Policy.2020,122:1-7.
[7] 王金鹏.论国家管辖范围以外区域海洋保护区的实践困境与国际立法要点[J].太平洋学报，2020,(9):52-63.
[8] Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v.Myanmar),judgment [Z].ITLOS Reports,2012:4.
[9] Fisheries jurisdiction (United Kingdom v.Iceland),declaration by Judge Nagendra Singh [Z].ICJ Reports 1972:41.
[10] Request for advisory opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission,advisory opinion [Z].ITLOS Reports,2015:4.
[11] Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v.Japan:New Zealand intervening) [Z].ICJ Reports,2014:226.
[12] MIV “SAIGA” (No.2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v.Guinea),judgment [Z].ITLOS Reports,1999:10.
[13] 张晏瑲.海洋法案例研习[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2015.
[14] 邢政.国际法视域下岛礁建设国际不法行为的判定[J].辽宁大学学报：哲学社会科学版，2019,(5):115-122.
[15] 薛桂芳.《联合国海洋法公约》与国家实践 [M].北京：海洋出版社，2011.
[16] Intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (General assembly resolution 72/249).Fourth substantive session [EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/content/fourth-substantive-session.2022-05-14.
[17] Maria Angela A.Ponce.Republic of the Philippines closing statement for IGC4 [EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/jsb9ap8sbnlw_en.pdf.2022-05-14.
[18] Intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction(General assembly resolution 72/249).Fifth substantive session [EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/fifth_substantive_session.2022-06-13.
[19] Kantai T,Bettelli P.Summary of the fourth session of the intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the UN convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction [J].Earth Negotiations Bulletin,2022,(25):1-22.
[20] Scovazzi T.Marine protected areas on the high seas:Some legal and policy considerations [J].The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,2004,(1):1-17.
[21] 白佳玉，齐郁.成本效益分析视角下中国参与北极合作的实证考察与政策阐析[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(3):68-77.
[22] 裴兆斌，王炎.国家管辖范围外渔业法律制度研究[J].中国渔业经济，2021,(1):2-12.
[23] WWF International Statement for Agenda Item 6.Informal informals on cross cutting issues-dispute resolution and settlement in IGC4[EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/agendaitem6informalinformalsoncrosscuttingissues14march 2022wwfint.pdf.2022-03-16.
[24] Fisheries jurisdiction (United Kingdom v.Iceland),jurisdiction of the Court,judgment[Z].I.C.J.Reports,1973:3.
[25] Textual proposals submitted by delegations by 20 February 2020,for consideration at the fourth session of the Intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Conference),in response to the invitation by the President of the Conference in her Note of 18 November 2019 (A/CONF.232/2020/3) [EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/textual_proposals_compilation_article-by-article_-_15_april_2020.pdf.2022-04-18.
[26] 阳平坚.全球碳中和博弈：中国的地位、挑战与选择[J].世界环境，2022,(2):53-57.
[27] 联合国会员国的增长[EB].https://www.un.org/zh/about-us/growth-in-un-membership.2022-04-17.
[28] 王虎华.国际公法学(第4版) [M].北京：北京大学出版社，2015.
[29] 孟令浩，王勇.BBNJ谈判中海洋保护区与沿海国外大陆架权利的调适[J].中国海商法研究，2019,(3):41-49.
[30] 郑苗壮.国家管辖范围以外区域海洋生物多样性国际协定谈判与中国参与[J].环境保护，2020,(Z2):70-74.
[31] 邢望望.海洋地理不利国问题之中国视角再审视[J].太平洋学报，2016,(1):11-19.
[32] 马得懿.公海元叙事与公海保护区的构建[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(3):86-96.
[33] Morgera E.,Appleton A.,et al.Summary of the first session of the intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the UN convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction:4-17 September 2018[J].Earth Negotiations Bulletin,2018,(25):1-18.
[34] The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (the Republic of Mauritius v.the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) .Award of 18 March 2015 [Z]:202.
[35] North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v.Netherlands),judgment,ICJ reports 1969,p.3.para.87;Fisheries jurisdiction (United Kingdom v.Iceland),pleadings,oral arguments [Z].ICJ Reports,1972:117.
[36] Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v.Iceland),Jurisdiction of the court,judgment,separate opinion of judge dillard [Z].ICJ Reports,1973:70-71.
[37] Textual Proposals Submitted by Delegations by 25 July 2022,for consideration at the Fifth session of the intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (The Conference),in response to the invitation by the President of the Conference in her note of 1 June 2022 (A/CONF.232/2022/5)[EB].https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/20220803bbnjigc5compilationproposals.pdf.2022-08-15.
[38] 程世礼.评罗尔斯的正义论[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(5):23-26.
[39] Harrison A.L.,Costa D.P.,et al.The political biogeography of migratory marine predators [J].Nature Ecology& Evolution,2018,(2):1571-1578.
[40] 陈炎，陈丕茂.南沙群岛金枪鱼资源初探[J].远洋渔业，2000,(2):7-10.
[41] 习近平集体会见出席海军成立70周年多国海军活动外方代表团团长[EB].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2019-04/23/c_1124404136.htm.2022-05-13.
(1)《公海公约》第2条。
(2)本表中的信息来自于联合国大会2022年6月1日发布的草案版本(A/CONF.232/2022/5)。
(3)《公约》第12部分第2节。
基本信息:
DOI：10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202302010
中图分类号:D993.5
引用信息:
[1]王婷婷,章晶晶.BBNJ协定中的“适当顾及”及我国之应对方案[J],2023,No.193(02):97-107.DOI:10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202302010.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大研究专项“公海保护区国际规则制定研究”(19VHQ006)之子课题“公海保护区相关政策和法律问题研究”;; 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“浙江省海洋生态损害赔偿诉讼机制研究”(19NDQN322YB)