| 84 | 0 | 9 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
中国具有客观且重要的北极权益，在“话语即权力”的国际政治现实中，构建长效话语机制是维护中国这一权益的重要手段。从现实情况来看，中国参与北极事务、维护北极权益，不仅面临不利的国际舆论环境，而且存在对外话语表达与回应的短效乃至失效问题。在中国特色大国外交理念指引下的北极治理价值倡议、北极域外实质性参与国家维护权益的话语活动逻辑的双重驱动下，中国应按照确保有效化、保持常态化、实现制度化的目标和要求，加快构建话语获取与转化机制、话语表达与回应机制及话语学习与创新机制，持续地掌握叙述权、利用阐释权、提升话语权。通过长效话语机制的构建，不断塑造中国维护北极权益的良好国际环境，更好地发挥中国在推动北极治理中的建设性作用。
Abstract：China owns objective and important Arctic rights and interests. In the international political state of "discourse is power", building a long-term discourse mechanism is an important means to protect China′s rights and interests. In reality, China′s participation in Arctic affairs and protection of its rights and interests in the Arctic not only faces an unfavorable international public opinion environment, but also suffers from short-term or even ineffective foreign discourse expression and response. Driven by the value initiative of Arctic governance under the guidance of the concept of major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteristics and the logic of discourse activities of non-Arctic countries that substantively participate in Arctic affairs to protect their rights and interests, our country should, according to the goals and requirements of ensuring effectiveness, keeping normalization, and realizing institutionalization, accelerate the construction of discourse acquisition and transformation mechanisms, discourse expression and response mechanisms, and discourse learning and innovation mechanisms, so as to continue to grasp the right to narrate, make use of the right to interpret, and enhance the right to discourse. Through the construction of a long-term discourse mechanism, China will continue to shape a favorable international environment for protecting its rights and interests in the Arctic and better play its constructive role in promoting Arctic governance.
[1] 郭可.国际舆论及其对我国的影响[J].新闻与传播研究，2003,(3):39-44.
[2] 胡欣.美国又在散布北极“中国威胁论”[J].世界知识，2019,(11):74.
[3] Wright D C.The Panda bear readies to meet the polar bear:China and Canada′s Arctic sovereignty challenge[R].Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute,March,2011.
[4] Lundestad I,Tunsj? ?.The United States and China in the Arctic[J].Polar Record,2015,51(4):392-403.
[5] Blank S,Kim Y.The Arctic and new security challenges in Asia[J].Pacific Focus,2013,28(3):319-342.
[6] GFoggo J III,Gosnell R.U.S.Martime strategy in the Arctic[J].Naval War College Review,2022,75(3):14-35.
[7] Council on ForeignRelations.Arctic imperatives:reinforcing U.S.strategy on America′s fourth coast[R].Independent Task Force Report No.75,March,2017.
[8] 姜胤安.“中国北极威胁论”:挑战与应对[J].国际研究参考，2020,(12):15-20.
[9] The Arctic Institute.Arctic security environment in flux:mitigating geopolitical competition through a military-security dialogue[R].https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/arctic-security-environment-flux-mitigating-geopolitical-competition-military-security-dialogue/,2021-02-11/2024-07-12.
[10] Pezard S,Flanagan S J.China′s strategy and activities in the Arctic[R].The RAND Corporation,Santa Monica,Calif.2022:vi-vii.
[11] 徐明棋.俄乌军事冲突给全球经济带来的冲击和影响[J].俄罗斯研究，2022,(3):41-46.
[12] Trym E.Securitise the volume:epistemic territorialisation and the geopolitics of China′s Arctic research[J].Territory,Politics,Governance,2024,12(1):93-111.
[13] 岳鹏，顾正声.俄乌冲突下北极地区安全面临的新形势及对中国的影响[J].俄罗斯学刊，2024,14(1):79-100.
[14] Основы государственной политики Российской Федерации в Арктике на период до 2035 года[EB].http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/45255,2023-02-21/2024-08-12.
[15] 赵宁宁，张杨晗.俄乌冲突背景下俄罗斯北极政策的调整、动因及影响[J].边界与海洋研究，2023,8(5):58-71.
[16] 褚章正.论中国参与北极环境治理的国际话语权构建[J].江汉论坛，2018,(5):45-49.
[17] CBC News.What does China′s new Arctic policy mean for Canada?[EB].https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/what-does-china-s-new-arctic-policy-mean-for-canada1.4506754,2018-01-27/2024-07-25.
[18] CHINA & US Focus.China in the Arctic:an identity struggle[EB].https://cn.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/20180227/26446.html#eng,2018-02-27/2024-07-19.
[19] 薛诗怡.中国主流媒体的北极报道现状及建议[J].青年记者，2020,(18):61-62.
[20] 刘晓玮.新中国参与全球海洋治理的进程及经验[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2018,(1):18-25.
[21] 杨松霖.涉北极研究智库国际传播能力建设：现实基础与优化路径[J].情报杂志，2022,41(4):84-89.
[22] 谢晓光，程新波，李沛珅.“冰上丝绸之路”建设中北极国际合作机制的重塑[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(2):13-25.
[23] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室网站.《中国的北极政策》白皮书(全文)[EB].http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/zfbps_2279/202207/t20220704_130569.html,2018-01-26/2024-09-16.
[24] 赵宁宁.论中国在北极治理中的国际责任及其践行路径[J].社会主义研究，2021,(1):148-155.
[25] 马丹彤，刘惠荣.原住民自治权视角下中国的北极治理参与[J].当代世界社会主义问题，2022,(2):140-149.
[26] 王华春，李志鹏，李琛，等.北极航道建设对中国的机遇、挑战及应对[J].国际经济合作，2024,40(4):67-76.
[27] 唐尧.从《北极海运评估报告》看中国参与北极治理[J].辽东学院学报(社会科学版),2021,23(5):26-31.
[28] 徐文韬.“冰上丝绸之路”:法律挑战与中国应对[J].重庆社会科学，2020,(8):84-94.
[29] 郭锐，孙天宇.制度性话语、制度性开放与制度性合作——全球治理体系变革的中国探索[J].教学与研究，2020,(8):81-92.
[30] 张佳佳，王晨光.北极治理话语权：主体、议题与机制[J].学术探索，2018,(10):20-25.
[31] 张甲英.全球公共产品视角下“冰上丝绸之路”分析[J].江南社会学院学报，2021,23(1):61-68.
[32] 孙凯，郭宏芹.美国北极科学外交及其对中国的启示[J].太平洋学报，2023,31(8):74-87.
[33] Steinveg B,Rottem S V,Andreeva S.Soft institutions in Arctic governance—who does what?[J].Polar Record,2024,(60):1-7.
[34] 叶青，王武林.非北极国家参与北极事务实践及中国路径[J].延边大学学报(社会科学版),2023,56(4):107-115.
[35] 肖洋.约束与突破：中国在北极理事会的规范性话语权提升路径探析[J].和平与发展，2020,(1):35-49.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202505003
中图分类号:D815;D822
引用信息:
[1]云宇龙,刘萍.中国维护北极权益的长效话语机制构建研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2025,No.208(05):20-30.DOI:10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202505003.
基金信息:
湖南省哲学社会科学基金青年项目“复杂性视角下的极地安全效应及其中国应对研究”(21YBQ047)