| 738 | 0 | 1041 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以新质生产力优化经济布局,促进新质生产力在城乡之间多层次布局和多方面协同,对推动城乡要素双向平等交换具有重要意义。通过对城乡要素平等交换的逻辑机理探讨,构建基于新质生产力的城乡要素平等交换机制,并分析在不同城乡梯度差异情况下新质生产力“进城”和“下乡”的路径。研究发现,国家的发展战略决定了城乡要素交换的逻辑起点,也派生了交换主体、要素市场和支撑机制,以及由此衍生的经济制度、政府行为等;新质生产力的拉力大小与城乡差距以及城乡要素交换阻力有关,要素向“乡”的拉力大于要素向“城”的拉力;新质生产力“进城”和“下乡”的路径应根据城乡梯度差异情况进行调整;乡村新质生产力的发展可以提高要素在乡村的边际报酬水平,利用比较优势吸引要素“下乡”。研究结果表明,新质生产力赋能城乡要素平等交换的路径包含从政策起点、传导路径、作用渠道到目标反馈的完整链条,通过构建自发型、内驱型城乡统筹发展方式,推动城乡融合发展,深化要素市场改革,拓展新质生产力发展空间,形成城乡融合发展新格局。
Abstract:Optimizing the economic layout with new quality productivity, promoting multi-level layout and multi-faceted coordination of new quality productivity between urban and rural areas, is of great significance for promoting the two-way equal exchange of urban and rural factors. By exploring the logical mechanism of equal exchange of urban and rural factors, the article aims to construct an equal exchange mechanism of urban and rural factors based on new quality productivity, and analyze the "going to the city" and "going to the countryside" paths of new quality productivity under different urban-rural gradient differences. The research has found that a country's development strategy determines the logical starting point of urban-rural factor exchange, and also produces exchange subjects, factor markets, and support mechanisms, as well as economic systems and government behaviour. The magnitude of the pulling force of new quality productivity is related to the urban-rural gap and the resistance of urban-rural factor exchange. The pulling force of factors towards the "township" is greater than the pulling force of factors towards the "city". The path of "going to the city" and "going to the countryside" for new quality productivity should be adjusted according to the differences in urban-rural gradients. The development of new quality productivity in rural areas can improve the marginal return level of factors in rural areas and attract factors to "go to the countryside" by utilizing comparative advantages. The research results indicate that the path of empowering equal exchange of urban and rural factors with new quality productivity includes a complete chain from policy starting point, transmission path, action channel to target feedback. By constructing a self-initiated and internally driven urban-rural coordinated development mode, the paper suggests promoting urban-rural integration development, deepening factor market reform, expanding the development space of new quality productivity, and forming a new pattern of urban-rural integration development.
[1] 周文,李雪艳.加快形成与新质生产力相适应的新型生产关系:理论逻辑与现实路径[J].政治经济学评论,2024,15(4):84-99.
[2] 刘洋,李浩源.新质生产力赋能高质量发展的逻辑理路、关键着力点与实践路径[J].经济问题,2024,(8):11-18,129.
[3] Si Y.Study on the path of integrated development of urban and rural areas in Kaifeng with county region as carrier[J].Open Access Library Journal,2023,10(3):1-9.
[4] 李明圆.新质生产力、乡村产业振兴与农民共同富裕[J].技术经济与管理研究,2024,(7):1-6.
[5] 仇焕广.新发展格局下畅通城乡要素流动:理论逻辑、内在要求与施策重点[J].天津社会科学,2024,(4):75-83,176.
[6] 王曙光.优质产业营商环境构建与新质生产力发展[J].新视野,2024,(4):55-64.
[7] Tacoli C.The links between urban and rural development[J].Environment and Urbanization,2003,15(1):3-12.
[8] Stewart Jr C T.The urban-rural dichotomy:concepts and uses[J].American Journal of Sociology,1958,64(2):152-158.
[9] 赵梓渝,袁泽鑫,王士君,等.中国城市新质生产功能网络结构及其影响因素研究——以战略性新兴产业为例[J].地理科学进展,2024,43(7):1261-1272.
[10] 徐芳,李秉远.新质人才赋能新质生产力的理论逻辑与现实路径[J].人口与经济,2024,(4):1-6,18.
[11] 姚凯.强化新质生产力人才的战略支撑作用[J].人口与经济,2024,(4):6-9,18.
[12] Lyons J,Utych S M.You′re not from here!:the consequences of urban and rural identities[J].Political Behavior,2023,45(1):75-101.
[13] 黄曼,庄晋财,孙泽南.城乡要素共生与乡村产业融合发展:基于依存条件和影响效应的多案例研究[J].中国软科学,2024,(6):101-110.
[14] 马珂琦.数实产业技术融合对城乡共同富裕的影响研究——基于新质生产力的中介效应检验[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,41(4):120-130.
[15] 万凌霄,杨果.数字经济赋能城乡融合发展的理论、堵点与路径[J].农村经济,2024,(5):89-98.
[16] Morandini S,Fraboni F,De Angelis M,et al.The impact of artificial intelligence on workers' skills:upskilling and reskilling in organisations[J].Informing Science,2023,(26):39-68.
[17] Du Y,Zhao Z,Liu S,et al.The impact of agricultural labor migration on the urban-rural dual economic structure:the case of liaoning province,China[J].Land,2023,12(3):622-636.
[18] Yu B,Zhou X.Urban administrative hierarchy and urban land use efficiency:evidence from Chinese cities[J].International Review of Economics & Finance,2023,(88):178-195.
[19] 韩媛媛,刘维奇.劳动力流动、产业空间布局与城乡融合发展[J].财经科学,2024,(5):118-131.
[20] 刘同山,晋燕.“立足三农、聚地而用”构建城乡融合发展新格局——兼析“人-地-产业”协同推进框架[J].价格理论与实践,2024,(1):72-79,213.
[21] 程广帅,余云翔.城乡产业融合与农民主体性提升[J].农业经济问题,2024,(5):122-132.
[22] 郭东,李琳.以融合促振兴:县域城乡产业融合对共同富裕的影响研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,(3):51-66.
[23] 杨守德,廖丹.数字技术赋能城乡产业协调发展的内在机制与实现路径[J].科技管理研究,2024,44(8):82-91.
[24] 曹艳秋,朱天康.产业智能化的城乡收入差距效应及减小路径研究[J].工业技术经济,2024,43(5):36-45.
[25] 卢艺文,杜林丰.共同富裕背景下流通产业结构升级与城乡居民消费差距关系研究[J].商业经济研究,2024,(8):23-26.
[26] 赵利,黄韵雪,汪发元.产业数字化、产业结构升级对共同富裕的影响——基于城乡收入差距的视角[J].统计与决策,2024,40(8):94-98.
[27] 雷永阔,汤欣燕.县域城乡融合发展推动中国式现代化的内在机理、现实窘境与实现路径[J].党政研究,2024,(3):57-67,125.
[28] Niu K,Xu H.Urban-rural integration and poverty:different roles of urban-rural integration in reducing rural and urban poverty in China[J].Social Indicators Research,2023,165(3):737-757.
[29] 文丰安,黄上珂.新质生产力助力基于新型城镇化的数字乡村建设审视[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2024,50(3):15-26.
[30] 王大超,赵红.数字技术助力城乡融合高质量发展的路径研究[J].理论探讨,2024,(4):152-158.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202501006
中图分类号:F124
引用信息:
[1]关松立,林淑伟.新质生产力与城乡要素平等交换的双向流动、梯度差异与路径[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2025,No.204(01):73-84.DOI:10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335X.202501006.
基金信息:
福建省科技厅创新战略研究计划项目“闽台科技产业创新促进福建全域融合发展机制研究”(2024R0062); 福建省社会科学规划项目“福建增强创新竞争力推进两大协同发展区高质量发展研究”(FJ2023BF040)