邹磊磊;黄硕琳;

• 1:上海海洋大学海洋政策与法律研究所

摘要(Abstract)：

2014年北极5国以北冰洋公海渔业管理"领导者"的姿态在其联盟会议上达成北冰洋公海渔业临时措施协议,并着力向国际社会推广该协议。北极5国在北冰洋公海渔业管理方面表现的"领导者"姿态由来已久,同时排斥其他利益相关方参与管理机制的构建,其单边主义行为的形成有其深刻的背景和原因。本论文以《联合国海洋法公约》与《鱼类种群协定》为视角,论述北极5国北冰洋公海渔业管理"领导者"地位的合法性,并在此基础上探讨中国的应对。

关键词(KeyWords)： 北极5国;北冰洋公海渔业管理;领导者;临时措施;合法性

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社科规划基金项目“北极公海渔业管理机制构建与中国的应对策略”(15YJAGJW007);; 国家海洋局“南北极环境综合考察与评估专项”子项目“极地法律体系研究”(CHINARE2015-04-05-04)

作者(Author): 邹磊磊;黄硕琳;

Email:

DOI: 10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335x.2016.03.002

参考文献(References)：

• [1]David A.Balton."Considering Future Arctic Fisheries"[C]in"Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea"Edited by Myron H.Nordquist,John Norton Moore,and Tomas H.Heidar.Boston:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2010:401-408.
• [2]Rose Rayfuse.Warm Waters and Cold Shoulders:Jostling for Jurisdiction in Polar Oceans[J].The Yearbook of Polar Law,Vol 1,2009:465-476.
• [3]Arctic Climate Impact Assessment.Impacts of a Warming Arctic——Arctic Climate Impact Assessment[R].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:454.
• [4]Chairman's Statement by the Five Arctic Ocean Coastal States at Meeting on Arctic Fisheries[R].Nuuk,Greenland,24-26February,2014.http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/Assets/2014/09/ArcticNationsAgreetoWorkonInternationalFisheriesAccord.pdf?la=en.2015-03-05.
• [5]The Declaration Concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean by the Five Arctic Ocean Coastal States at meeting on Arctic Fisheries[R].Oslo,Norway,16July,2015.https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/departementene/ud/vedlegg/folkerett/declaration-onarctic-fisheries-16-july-2015.pdf.2015-09-05.
• [6]"No Fishing at the North Pole",New York Times,22July,2015.
• [7]"Canada Joins Arctic Fishing Moratorium",Times Colonist,28February,2014.
• [8]Chairman's Statement by the Five Arctic Ocean Coastal States at Meeting on Future Arctic Fisheries[R].Washington,D.C.,U.S.,29 April-1 May,2013.http://www.state.gov/e/oes/rls/pr/2013/209176.htm.2015-03-05."At present,there is no need to establish any additional RFMO or RFMO(s)for this area."
• [9]The Ilulissat Declaration by the Five Arctic Ocean Coastal States at Arctic Ocean Conference[R].Ilulissat,Greenland,27-29May,2008.http://www.oceanlaw.org/downloads/arctic/Ilulissat_Declaration.pdf.2015-03-05."By virtue of their sovereignty,sovereign rights and jurisdiction in large areas of the Arctic Ocean the five coastal states are in unique position to address these possibilities and challenges.""The five states have a stewardship role in protecting."
• [10]Chairman's Summary by the Five Arctic Ocean Coastal States Foreign Ministers'Meeting[R].Chelsea,Canada,29 March,2010.http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/5E2FEF2614D7AE2BC32576F600592DE5.2015-03-05."Arctic Ocean coastal states have an important stewardship role in the region."
• [11]Anne Babcock Hollowed,Benjamin Planque,and Harald Loeng.Potential Movement of Fish and Shellfish Stocks from the Sub-Arctic to the Arctic Ocean[J].Fisheries Oceanography,Vol.22,No.5,2013:355-370.
• [12]Lilly Weidemann.International Governance of the Arctic Marine Environment with Particular Emphasis on High Seas Fisheries[M].Switzerland:Springer,2014:28-31.
• [13]Erik J.Molenaar."Climate Change and Arctic Fisheries"[C]in"Cliamte Governance in the Arctic"edited by Timo Koivurova,E.C.Keskitalo and Nigel Bankes,Netherland:Springer,2009:145-169.
• [14]赵树理.国际海洋法法庭的创建——我的个人经历和感受[J].中外法学,1997,(5):515-521.
• [15]赵文婷.沿海国渔业管辖权的扩展[D].北京:中国政法大学,2009.
• [16]李扬.沿海国对海洋渔业的管辖扩张[J].社会科学家,2012,(11):16-19.
• [17]Jennifer L.Bailey.States,Stocks,and Sovereignty:High Seas Fishing and the Expansion of State Sovereignty.Conflich and the Environment[J].NATO ASI Series,Vol 33,1997:215-234.
• [18]Lorraine Ridgeway."Issues in Arctic Fisheries Governance:A Canadian Perspective"[C]in"Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea"edited by Myron H.Nordquist,John Norton Moore and Tomas H.Heidar.Boston:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2010:409-446.
• [19]Timo Koivurova,Erik J.Molenaar,and David L.Vanderzwaag.Canada,the EU,and Arctic Ocean Governance:a Tangled and Shifting Seascape and Future Directions[J].Journal of Transnatinal Law and Policy,Vol.18,No.2,2009:248-287.
• [20]邹磊磊.南北极渔业管理机制的对比研究及中国极地渔业政策[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2014.
• [21]Erik Molenaar.Arctic Fisheries Conservation and Management:Initial Steps of Reform of the International Legal Framework[J].The Yearbook of Polar Law,Vol.1,2009:427-464.
• [22]Michael Byers.International Law and the Arctic[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2013.
• (1)《联合国海洋法公约》第63条“出现在两个或两个以上沿海国专属经济区的种群或出现在专属经济区内而又出现在专属经济区外的邻接区域内的种群”。
• (2)《联合国海洋法公约》第87条“公海自由”。
• (3)《联合国海洋法公约》第116条“公海上捕鱼的权利”。
• (4)《联合国海洋法公约》第117条“各国为其国民采取养护公海生物资源措施的义务”。
• (5)《联合国海洋法公约》第118条“各国在养护与管理生物资源方面的合作”。
• (6)《联合国海洋法公约》第119条“公海生物资源的养护”。
• (7)《联合国海洋法公约》第63条“出现在两个或两个以上沿海国专属经济区的种群或出现在专属经济区内而又出现在专属经济区外的邻接区域内的种群”第2款。
• (8)《联合国海洋法公约》第64条“高度洄游鱼种”第1款。
• (9)《联合国海洋法公约》第117条“各国为其国民采取养护公海生物资源措施的义务”。
• (10)《联合国海洋法公约》第118条“各国在养护与管理生物资源方面的合作”。
• (11)《联合国海洋法公约》第119条“公海生物资源的养护”第2款。
• (12)《联合国海洋法公约》第119条“公海生物资源的养护”第3款。
• (13)《鱼类种群协定》第7条“养护和管理措施的互不抵触”第1款。
• (14)《鱼类种群协定》第7条“养护和管理措施的互不抵触”第2款。
• (15)《鱼类种群协定》第6条“预防性措施的适用”。
• (16)《鱼类种群协定》第8条“养护与管理的合作”第3款。
• (17)《鱼类种群协定》第7条“养护与管理措施的互不抵触”。

文章评论(Comment)：